Are Lock-In Contracts with Real Estate Agencies Good or Bad?
Short answer: A contract is great when it’s paired with a clear Service Guarantee that gives you an exit if the agency doesn’t deliver.
Jump to
Why contracts exist (and how they protect you)
Nearly everything important in life runs on agreements — your mortgage, utilities, insurance, even your mobile plan. Your property management is no different. A written managing authority (the contract) sets out:
- What the agency must do (scope of service, communication standards, reporting).
- What you agree to (fees, instructions, access, timely approvals).
- How issues are handled (timeframes, escalation, exit options).
Done properly, the contract holds the agency accountable and gives you a clear remedy if they don’t deliver. It also gives your property manager team stability to do their best work for you.
What is a Service Guarantee?
A Service Guarantee is a written promise that defines the minimum service you’ll receive and the exit rights you have if standards aren’t met. In short, it replaces vague “no lock-in” slogans with clear, measurable commitments.
- Leasing timeframes: e.g., lease within a set number of weeks, or you can exit.
- Communication standards: post-home open feedback, routine inspection updates, and response times.
- Reporting & access: property condition reports, financial statements, and owner portal access.
How a contract + guarantee works in practice
- Scope is clear. You know exactly what’s included, and when.
- Performance is measured. Leasing timeframes, communication, and reports are tracked.
- If standards slip, you can exit. The guarantee spells out your rights to terminate without fuss.
This approach protects you while encouraging the agency to maintain high standards — not rely on vague promises.
Pros & Cons: “No Lock-In” vs “Contract + Service Guarantee”
Both approaches involve responsibilities. The difference is whether the agency wants to be held to them in writing.
“No Lock-In” Management
- Pros:
- Easy to leave if unhappy.
- Low perceived risk for first-time landlords.
- Cons:
- Standards often aren’t written, so accountability is fuzzy.
- If they won’t let you hold them to their own contract, how do you know they won’t walk when things get difficult — usually your biggest time of need?
- Can signal low confidence or inconsistency.
Contract + Service Guarantee
- Pros:
- Clear standards in black & white.
- Exit rights are written if standards aren’t met.
- Encourages accountability and professionalism.
- Team stability = better long-term service.
- Cons:
- Some landlords perceive “contract” as restrictive — but with a genuine guarantee, it’s protective, not trapping.
Red flags to watch for
- No written standards. If there’s no documented service promise, it’s just talk.
- “Trust us” only. Confidence is great — written guarantees are better.
- Confusing exit terms. You should clearly see when and how you can leave.
- Reluctance around contracts. Property management is a contract-driven service — avoiding contracts is a warning sign.
Our Service Guarantee (Mandurah City Real Estate)
- Leasing timeframe: If we can’t lease your property within 3 weeks, we have 1 additional week. If it’s still not leased, you’re free to exit.
- Communication: Feedback after home opens, routine inspection updates, and timely responses within agreed timeframes.
- Reporting & access: Property condition reports, monthly/EOFY financial statements, and owner portal access.
- If we fail the standard, you can exit: If we don’t meet the written standards and haven’t rectified promptly, you’re not locked in.
FAQs
Is a lock-in contract always bad for landlords?
What if the agency under-delivers?
Why do agencies prefer contracts?
Does “no lock-in” mean better service?
Talk to a property manager
Want a copy of our Service Guarantee and managing authority? We’ll send the exact standards we work to, in writing.
Join The Discussion